POAM - Templates & Examples for NIST 800-171 & DFARS Compliance


Join thousands of professionals and get the latest insight on Compliance & Cybersecurity.
For organizations handling Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and working with the Department of Defense (DoD), developing a Plan of Action and Milestones (POAM) is not just a paperwork exercise—it's a critical component of your cybersecurity compliance strategy. Whether you're a CISO at a mid-sized company, an IT Compliance Manager, or an IT Manager at an SMB, understanding POAMs is essential for achieving and maintaining NIST 800-171 and DFARS compliance.
What is a POAM and Why Does it Matter?
A Plan of Action and Milestones (POAM) is a structured document that identifies and tracks the remediation of security vulnerabilities within your information systems. Originally defined in NIST Special Publication 800-53 as part of the Security Assessment and Authorization Control Family (Control CA-5), POAMs have become a cornerstone of federal cybersecurity compliance programs.
For organizations subject to NIST 800-171 and DFARS requirements, POAMs serve as:


- A compliance documentation tool that demonstrates your commitment to addressing security gaps
- A risk management instrument that prioritizes remediation efforts based on vulnerability severity
- A project management resource that tracks progress toward full compliance
- An audit preparation asset that streamlines evidence collection for assessors
As one IT Compliance Manager noted in a recent forum discussion: "If you think it's an IT/IT Systems only thing, you are also wrong." POAMs represent a holistic organizational approach to security compliance, not just a technical checklist.
POAM Requirements for NIST 800-171 & DFARS Compliance
Under DFARS clause 252.204-7012 and related requirements (7019, 7020, 7021), defense contractors must implement the security controls specified in NIST SP 800-171. However, the DoD recognizes that achieving full compliance can take time. This is where POAMs come into play.
The DFARS requirements specifically allow for POAMs as part of your compliance strategy:
- DFARS 7019 requires contractors to conduct assessments against NIST 800-171 requirements and submit summary scores to the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS)
- DFARS 7020 enables the DoD to verify those assessments
- DFARS 7021 introduces the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) program, which builds upon NIST 800-171 requirements
When submitting your assessment scores to SPRS, you're permitted to use POAMs to document security controls that aren't yet fully implemented—provided you have a clear plan to address these gaps.
Essential Components of an Effective POAM
A well-crafted POAM doesn't just list vulnerabilities—it provides a comprehensive roadmap for remediation. Here are the critical components that should be included in your POAM documentation:


1. Header Information
- Organization name and contact information
- System name and identifier
- System owner/manager
- Date created and last updated
- System impact level (Low, Moderate, High, Critical)
2. Weakness Identification
- Unique identifier for each vulnerability or gap
- Specific NIST 800-171 control reference number
- Detailed description of the security weakness
- Weakness discovery date
- Weakness identification source (assessment, audit, penetration test)
3. Risk Assessment
- Risk rating/severity level (Critical, High, Medium, Low)
- Potential impact if not remediated
- Likelihood of exploitation
- Overall risk score or categorization
4. Remediation Plan
- Detailed corrective actions required
- Resources needed (budget, personnel, tools)
- Responsible office, team, or individual
- Realistic milestones with interim completion dates
- Final scheduled completion date
- Current status (Not Started, In Progress, Delayed, Completed)
5. Verification and Tracking
- Method for validating remediation effectiveness
- Evidence of completion requirements
- Status update frequency
- Risk adjustment after remediation
- Links to supporting documentation
"One of the biggest challenges we face is the time-consuming documentation and evidence gathering processes required for compliance," shared a Compliance Manager during a recent industry forum. A well-organized POAM helps address this pain point by establishing clear documentation practices from the outset.
Best Practices for Creating and Managing POAMs
Based on real-world experiences from organizations that have successfully navigated NIST 800-171 and DFARS compliance, here are proven best practices for POAM management:
1. Document with Precision
Be specific and detailed when describing security weaknesses. Vague descriptions make it difficult to develop effective remediation strategies. Include:
- Exactly which system, component, or process is affected
- How the vulnerability was identified
- What specific aspect of the NIST 800-171 control is not being met
- Any temporary mitigations already in place
2. Prioritize Based on Risk
Not all vulnerabilities pose the same level of risk. Develop a consistent risk rating methodology to prioritize remediation efforts:
- Consider the sensitivity of affected data
- Evaluate the exploitability of the vulnerability
- Assess the potential business impact
- Factor in compliance deadlines and contractual obligations
3. Set Realistic Timelines
"The realistic timeline for implementation of NIST SP 800-171 from scratch is no less than 6-months," noted one experienced practitioner. When establishing remediation timelines:
- Collaborate with technical teams who will implement the fixes
- Consider dependencies between remediation activities
- Account for resource constraints and competing priorities
- Build in buffer time for testing and verification
- Align with business cycles to minimize operational disruption
4. Establish Consistent Monitoring
POAMs are living documents that require regular updates:
- Schedule weekly or bi-weekly POAM review meetings
- Implement a dashboard for easy visualization of POAM status
- Document progress updates with specific percentages or milestones
- Flag items that are behind schedule for leadership attention
- Celebrate completed remediations to maintain momentum
5. Verify and Close with Rigor
When a remediation action is complete, verify its effectiveness:
- Perform testing to confirm the vulnerability is truly resolved
- Gather and store evidence of remediation for audit purposes
- Update related security documentation to reflect the changes
- Adjust the risk rating based on post-remediation assessment
- Formally close the POAM item with approval from security leadership
POAM Templates and Examples for NIST 800-171 Compliance
Having a standardized POAM template ensures consistency and completeness. Here are valuable resources to get you started:
1. NIST SP 800-171 POAM Template
The NIST SP 800-171 POAM Template provides a solid foundation for documenting your remediation plans. This official template includes:
- Fields for all required POAM components
- Formatting consistent with federal standards
- Instructions for completion
- Categorization aligned with NIST 800-171 control families
2. Community-Developed Resources
The CMMC Audit Preparation portal offers additional templates and tools specifically designed for companies working toward NIST SP 800-171 and DFARS compliance, including:
- Customizable POAM spreadsheets
- Policy templates that align with NIST 800-171 controls
- Sample System Security Plans (SSPs) that complement POAMs
- Documentation packages for different organization sizes
3. Real-World POAM Example
To illustrate how a completed POAM might look, here's a simplified example for a common NIST 800-171 compliance gap:
Weakness ID: AC-2021-01
Control Reference: 3.1.2 - Limit system access to the types of transactions and functions that authorized users are permitted to execute.
Weakness Description: Current file server permissions use group-based access control but lack role-based access controls for sensitive project directories containing CUI.
Risk Rating: Medium
Remediation Plan: Implement role-based access control (RBAC) for file servers housing CUI. Create roles based on job functions, map users to appropriate roles, and configure permissions accordingly.
Responsible Party: IT Infrastructure Team
Resources Required: 80 hours of IT staff time, $5,000 for consultant support
Milestone 1: Complete RBAC design document by 5/15/2023
Milestone 2: Implement RBAC in test environment by 6/1/2023
Milestone 3: Complete user testing by 6/15/2023
Final Completion Date: 6/30/2023
Current Status: In Progress (75% complete)
Verification Method: Security team will validate permissions using access control audit tools and manual testing.
This example demonstrates the level of detail required for an effective POAM that would satisfy both internal stakeholders and external auditors.
Automating POAM Management
As organizations mature in their compliance efforts, many find that manual POAM tracking becomes unwieldy, particularly for complex environments with numerous systems and controls. Automation can significantly reduce the burden of POAM management.
NIST itself encourages the use of automated tools to streamline POAM tracking and reporting. These solutions can:
- Automatically pull vulnerability data from security tools
- Track remediation progress in real-time
- Generate compliance reports with minimal manual effort
- Provide dashboards for executive visibility
- Send alerts when remediation deadlines approach
According to one IT Security Manager: "Time for documentation. Time for evidence gathering and organization." These pain points can be substantially reduced through appropriate automation.


Tools for Streamlining POAM Management
Several types of solutions can assist with POAM management:
- GRC Platforms that include compliance management capabilities
- Dedicated Compliance Management Tools designed specifically for frameworks like NIST 800-171
- Security Automation and Orchestration Solutions that integrate with your existing security tools
- Custom-developed tracking systems built on platforms like SharePoint or ServiceNow
How CyberSierra Simplifies NIST 800-171 Compliance and POAM Management
For organizations struggling with the complexity of NIST 800-171 compliance, CyberSierra's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) module provides a streamlined approach to POAM management. The platform helps:
- Automate evidence collection from disparate systems, reducing the manual burden on IT and security teams
- Maintain a central repository of all controls, gaps, and remediation plans
- Track POAM progress with real-time dashboards and automated notifications
- Generate audit-ready reports that demonstrate compliance efforts to DoD assessors
- Map controls across frameworks, simplifying compliance with multiple requirements
CyberSierra's Continuous Control Monitoring (CCM) capabilities are particularly valuable for organizations seeking to move beyond point-in-time compliance to continuous assurance. By providing near real-time visibility into control effectiveness, the platform helps identify potential compliance gaps before they become audit findings that require POAMs.
Common Challenges and Solutions in POAM Implementation
Based on feedback from professionals working with NIST 800-171 and DFARS compliance, several common challenges emerge in POAM management:


Challenge 1: Establishing Realistic Timelines
Problem: Teams often underestimate the time required to implement remediation actions, leading to missed deadlines and credibility issues.
Solution: Work closely with technical teams to establish achievable timelines. Include buffer time for unexpected complications, and consider breaking complex remediations into smaller, more manageable milestones.
Challenge 2: Resource Constraints
Problem: "The more I dive into this, the more I realize this may not be something we can just do in-house," shared one IT Manager, highlighting the resource challenges many organizations face.
Solution: Be honest about resource limitations in your POAM. Where appropriate, consider engaging external expertise for specialized remediation tasks, and clearly document resource requirements when seeking budget approval.
Challenge 3: Tracking Progress Accurately
Problem: Without a standardized method for tracking progress, status updates can be subjective and inconsistent.
Solution: Implement objective metrics for measuring progress, such as the percentage of sub-tasks completed or specific technical milestones achieved. Use a centralized tracking system accessible to all stakeholders.
Challenge 4: Maintaining Momentum
Problem: POAM efforts often start strong but lose momentum as teams return to day-to-day operational priorities.
Solution: Schedule regular POAM review meetings with executive participation. Integrate POAM tasks into team performance metrics, and celebrate progress to maintain motivation.
Challenge 5: Evidence Collection and Documentation
Problem: Gathering evidence of remediation completion is often an afterthought, leading to scrambling when audits approach.
Solution: Define evidence requirements at the outset of each POAM item. Use automated tools to collect and store evidence where possible, and establish a documentation standard that satisfies audit requirements.
Integrating POAMs with Your Broader Security Program
While POAMs focus on specific compliance gaps, they should be integrated with your overall security program for maximum effectiveness:
1. Align with Risk Management Processes
Ensure that POAM risk ratings are consistent with your organization's broader risk management framework. High-risk POAM items should automatically feed into your enterprise risk register.
2. Connect with Change Management
Coordinate remediation activities with your change management process to minimize operational disruptions and ensure that changes are properly tested before implementation.
3. Inform Security Awareness Training
Use trends identified in your POAMs to enhance security awareness training. If multiple POAMs relate to similar issues (e.g., password management), target those areas in your training program.
4. Leverage for Continuous Improvement
Analyze completed POAMs to identify root causes and systemic issues. Use these insights to improve security architecture and policies, reducing the need for future POAMs.
Conclusion: POAMs as Strategic Tools for NIST 800-171 and DFARS Compliance
A well-managed POAM process is more than just a compliance exercise—it's a strategic approach to improving your security posture while meeting regulatory requirements. For organizations subject to NIST 800-171 and DFARS requirements, POAMs provide:
- A structured methodology for addressing compliance gaps
- A transparent way to communicate progress to leadership and auditors
- A mechanism for prioritizing security investments
- A historical record of security improvements over time
As one experienced CISO put it: "The value isn't just in checking the compliance box—it's in the systematic improvement of your security controls that POAMs drive when done right."
By following the best practices, utilizing available templates, and potentially leveraging automation tools like CyberSierra's GRC platform, organizations of all sizes can transform POAM management from a bureaucratic burden into a strategic advantage in their cybersecurity program.
Remember, successful NIST 800-171 and DFARS compliance is not a destination but a journey of continuous improvement—and a well-crafted POAM is your roadmap for that journey.


Additional Resources
- NIST Special Publication 800-53 - The foundation for federal security controls, including the POAM requirement
- DFARS Compliance Guide - Comprehensive guide to understanding DFARS requirements
- CMMC Overview - Official DoD guidance on the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification program
- Kieri Compliance Documentation - A valuable source of templates and checklists for NIST 800-171 compliance
CyberSierra is an AI-enabled cybersecurity platform that simplifies and automates compliance with standards like NIST 800-171, enabling organizations to achieve and maintain compliance efficiently while reducing manual effort. Learn more about how CyberSierra can streamline your POAM management process at cybersierra.co/platform-governance-risk-compliance/.